From Commons, uploaded by Ed; originally from ; the licence is cc-by-2.0; illustrates Coyote nicely.
Nominate and support. - James F.(talk) 03:59, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Support. Beautiful detail. ed g2s • talk 04:04, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Support. Stunning. Autiger 03:49, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Support. Great detail and shot. I wonder if it cropping a little of right would make it even better? Janderk 09:10, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Support -- I wouldn't crop, since the picture as it now stands centers (or nearly so) on the eye of the coyote, and I like it that way. :-) But I leave it to wiser photographical minds than mine to make the final decision. Jwrosenzweig 21:21, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Oppose. Poor photography. --] 19:37, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Just out of interest, why do you think so? Enochlau 19:19, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Support Oppose, I need to be consistent with my concern about just including the head of an animal as a featured picture. - Bevo 23:29, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Oppose, regretfully, due to ear being cut off. -- Chris 73Talk 23:59, Dec 19, 2004 (UTC)
Oppose - need that eartop. - Trick 18:16, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Support. Don't care that much about the ear. Truly stunning shot. Look at the full-sized version, seriously. grendel|khan 05:51, 2004 Dec 21 (UTC)
Support - it would probably be better with the tips of the ears and the harsh change in background tone is a little distracting, but the intent look and square on profile make up for it. -- Solipsist 23:51, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)