- Support as nominator --Fir0002 14:05, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
- Support I think the quality is excellent. Dogposter 23:46, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
- Support -Stunning and beautifully crisp. Himalayan 20:43, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- Pretty much anything you downsample to 1.6 MP should be crisp! --Dschwen 01:36, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support. Does what it says it does. It could also go into the gallery in Australian Pelican, although I understand why you might not have. Putting something into a gallery in a second article weakens its chances here, even when it has high EV in the first. Mostlyharmless (talk) 03:03, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support Good image with good EV, much better than the only other flying pic in the article.Terri G (talk) 12:05, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support --Avala (talk) 18:34, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Promoted File:Australian pelican in flight.jpg --Staxringold talkcontribs 04:29, 5 September 2009 (UTC)