Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Jan 2011 at 01:38:25 (UTC)
- Reason
- Very few available images for this species. The shells give good context.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Red-necked Stint
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
- Creator
- Noodle snacks
- Support as nominator --Noodle snacks (talk) 01:38, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 14:03, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support Great capture of the species, the feet are slightly obscured by the shells but not enough to worry about. Fallschirmjäger ✉ 21:39, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support as per Fallschirmjäger. Purpy Pupple (talk) 08:04, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support -- I'm seeing a bit of chromatic aberration on the beak, but am happy to support anyway. NotFromUtrecht (talk) 09:06, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Lack of contrast at the breast, no differentiation from background, significant noise on beak and feathers. I'll also note, by the by, that resolution on subject is less than other currently opposed images. It would be nice to have some consistency. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 09:11, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- Particularly with regard to application of the criteria. Noodle snacks (talk) 05:04, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry the "lack of contrast at the breast" is the killer for me. Aaadddaaammm (talk) 17:40, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
Promoted File:Calidris ruficollis 2.jpg --Makeemlighter (talk) 01:38, 5 January 2011 (UTC)