If anything I think the comment was made intending to get less focus on the head and more on the whole body, not to show head only... But maybe that's just how I read it... gazhiley.co.uk15:00, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
What Spikebrennan said was "it looks like the creature is almost all head". I doubt that this is the situation in the alternative version as well. --Tomer T (talk) 17:20, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
Right, and therefore to dispel that view, removing the body completely is not the answer - it is to show it at a better angle that proves that it isn't all head... After all, prior to the part you copied he also stated "I am doubtful about the EV of this specific angle" and thus a better angle would remove doubt... removing the body does not create a better angle... gazhiley.co.uk18:14, 25 May 2011 (UTC)