Simply superb image in many ways - particularly the breathtaking sharpness. Taken by Mdf

Nominate and Support Edit 1 --Fir0002 02:11, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Support--Mbz1 (talk) 02:56, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Oppose Grainy at full resolution; and IMHO it's a bit oversharpened. CillaИ ♦ XC 03:03, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- Remeber that the comparative level of noise at 100% is related to resolution; a grainy pic at 8 megapixels often is less noisy than a clean one a 2 megapixels. thegreen J Are you green? 03:21, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
  - Removed noise --Fir0002 03:44, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
    - Even better! thegreen J Are you green? 04:20, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

The edit is a big improvement. I still think the bird is a bit oversharpened, though...changing my vote to Neutral. CillaИ ♦ XC 16:24, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Support edit 1 thegreen J Are you green? 03:21, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Support edit1 but would like to see a caption. Muhammad Mahdi Karim (talk) 13:30, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Support edit1 Good job. -- Laitche (talk) 16:05, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Support edit1 de Bivort 18:53, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Support edit1 Samsara (talk • contribs) 04:55, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Support edit1 --Aqwis (talk – contributions) 22:32, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Support edit 1. Good picture. Malinaccier (talk • contribs) 00:54, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Oppose for the first one; weak oppose for the second one. Particularly it seems to be a bit to blurred. Not bad, but also not excellent. —αἰτίας •discussion• 22:01, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Blurred? You can see the individual hairs (or whatever they're called) on the feathers! --antilived^{T | C | G} 05:57, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Promoted Image:Spizella-passerina-015 edit.jpg --Chris.B • talk 16:38, 12 December 2007 (UTC)