The result was to delete the image.
Since the building exists, it could be photographed, and that photo could be freely licensed. Thus it is replaceable and fails our non-free content policy. – Quadell (talk) (random) 19:10, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Regarding the above, I have since been convinced that this image could be used to show the building's construction, and it would therefore pass our non-free content guidelines in this very narrow usage. I have therefore restored the image. – Quadell (talk) (random) 12:16, 18 June 2007 (UTC)