Support as nominator --James Michael DuPont (talk) 07:21, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
Weak Support nice image but it only shows EV for a paragraph. Spongie555 (talk) 04:22, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Weak support per Spongie. --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 11:26, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
Oppose Good framing, but the image is poor quality with low resolution (thus not so much detail), sky blown out, and unnatural colours. Most importantly, it only partially illustrates a list, so I don't see how it would be "among Wikipedia's most educational work"--Elekhh (talk) 03:08, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
Neutral, leaning toward oppose. The quality's not good, plus not sure of the importance of a fake waterfall. But if it is WP:NOTABLE then considering it's geographic location (needs geocoding also BTW) it might be hard to replace, so... --I'ḏ ♥One 04:32, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
INFO The waterfall is not fake. When I was there there was a LOT of water. Here are some more pictures. commons:Category:Miruša_Waterfalls . This was one of the first submission from our photo contest there will be more. I am also learning about this system. thanks for your patience.James Michael DuPont (talk) 08:47, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
- So why the hose? It's kind of unnecessary then. --I'ḏ ♥One 20:36, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Not promoted --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 12:39, 24 November 2010 (UTC)