Today, Court of Justice of the African Union is a topic of great interest and relevance in today's society. The impact of Court of Justice of the African Union extends to different aspects of daily life, generating debates, research and reflections in different areas. It is important to deeply analyze Court of Justice of the African Union to understand its influence and find possible solutions to the challenges it poses. In this article, we will explore in detail the various aspects of Court of Justice of the African Union, addressing its implications in different contexts and offering a comprehensive view of this significant topic. Along these lines, we will delve into a critical analysis of Court of Justice of the African Union, seeking to understand its scope and project its possible consequences in the future.
The Court of Justice of the African Union was originally intended to be the "principal judicial organ" of the African Union (Protocol of the Court of Justice of the African Union, Article 2.2) with authority to rule on disputes over interpretation of AU treaties. The Court has, however, never come into existence because the African Union has decided that it should be merged with the African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights to form a new court: the African Court of Justice and Human Rights (ACJHR). Underlying this decision was the concern at the growing number of AU institutions, which the AU could not afford to support.
A protocol to set up the Court of Justice was adopted in 2003, and entered into force in 2009. It was, however, superseded by a protocol creating the African Court of Justice and Human Rights.
The merger protocol was adopted during the 11th African Union Summit in July 2008. The united court will be based in Arusha, Tanzania.
