Today, Yeaw v. Boy Scouts of America is a topic that keeps society in constant debate and reflection. From its origins to the present day, Yeaw v. Boy Scouts of America has been the object of study, admiration and controversy. Its impact on people's daily lives is undeniable, and its influence in areas such as politics, culture, technology and education is evident. Throughout history, Yeaw v. Boy Scouts of America has evolved and adapted to the needs and demands of society, becoming an indispensable element in modern life. In this article, we will explore different aspects and perspectives related to Yeaw v. Boy Scouts of America, analyzing its importance, its consequences and its future.
The Boy Scouts of America are not considered a "business establishment" and do not fall under the provisions of California's Unruh Civil Rights Act. Decision of the Court of Appeal is reversed.
Yeaw v. Boy Scouts of America was a high-profile case filed in 1997 before the Supreme Court of California to determine whether the Boy Scouts of America is a business establishment within the meaning of the Unruh Civil Rights Act (Civ. Code, § 51) or has the right to exclude girls from membership.
Background
Katrina Yeaw attempted to join her twin brother Daniel's Boy Scout Troop No. 349 in the Golden Empire Council in her hometown of Rocklin, California. When she was rejected due to the fact she is female, she filed suit against the Boy Scouts of America, accusing them of discrimination.[unreliable source?]
^"Katrina Yeaw v BSA". Exclusionary Practices & Policies of the Boy Scouts of America. January 22, 2005. Archived from the original on November 17, 2007. Retrieved January 8, 2022.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)